|
A patent holder in Canada has the exclusive right, privilege and liberty to making, constructing, using and selling the invention for the term of the patent, from the time the patent is granted.〔(), ''Patent Act'', RSC 1985, c P-4, s 42.〕 Any person who does any of these acts in relation to an invention without permission of the patent owner is liable for patent infringement. When faced with an action for patent infringement, the defendant has a number of defences that they can use. These roughly fall into three categories: # Non-infringement, asserting that the defendant does not make, use or sell the patented invention; # Invalidity, asserting that the patent should not have been granted in view of prior art; # Defences based on user rights, statutory or otherwise. Remedies in Canadian patent law generally track both common law and equitable remedies.〔 Equitable remedies include injunctions (both final and interlocutory) and an accounting of profits. Common law remedies include damages aimed at putting the plaintiff in the position he would have occupied had the infringement not occurred. ==Invalidity Defences== In order to obtain a patent, an invention must be: * Allowable subject matter; * New; * Useful; * Not obvious to a person skilled in the art.〔(), ''Patent Act'', RSC 1985, c P-4, ss 2, 28.2, 28.3.〕 The Canadian ''Patent Act'' allows that: Therefore, if a person can show that a patent claims improper subject matter, is anticipated, inoperable or obvious, then the patent can be declared void. For example, if a defendant can show evidence that the claimed invention was known as of the claim date, and thus the invention is not new, the patent can be declared void. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Defences and remedies in Canadian patent law」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|